<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maxwell not Maxwell?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://in2deep.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/maxwell-not-maxwell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://in2deep.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/maxwell-not-maxwell/</link>
	<description>observations on the road home...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:01:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Davidya</title>
		<link>http://in2deep.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/maxwell-not-maxwell/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://in2deep.wordpress.com/?p=198#comment-538</guid>
		<description>As a further remark on this, its notable the alternate spatial dimensions are seen as minuscule, curved in on themselves. In fact, higher resolutions are more generalized, moving progressively from expressed to potential. They are progressively larger spatial infinities until space itself is transcended in the subject-object relationship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a further remark on this, its notable the alternate spatial dimensions are seen as minuscule, curved in on themselves. In fact, higher resolutions are more generalized, moving progressively from expressed to potential. They are progressively larger spatial infinities until space itself is transcended in the subject-object relationship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
