I also tend to use comments as a jumping off point and write to the larger audience, not always to the person there. Guess its kind of how I see the world. What individual? (laughs)

Thank you for leading to new clarity and another facet of the gem.

Anyway, all one is saying is, there is no I to refer to as events unfold. No self to interpret what is happening. I am not saying this is the way it should be, or that theoretically it is what could be happening. This is the life lived within this organism. It is not a story, because if it were, there would be a storyteller. But there isn’t.

It is true that if there is a storyteller with an intention, then it is all made up. But does the nothing know itself, or is that just the story thought believes about what might be (about the nothing)?

Thought cannot touch this nothing, as you put it, because it can only function within what it already knows. It can theorize and imagine beautifully, but that cannot help.

At least not in the situation we are talking about here.

Thanks for all your comments over at the blog. I appreciate it.